Programme NotesGerald Larner Archive

ComposersJohann Sebastian Bach › Programme note

Sonata No.2 in A minor for solo violin BWV 1003 (before 1720)

by Johann Sebastian Bach (1685–1750)
Programme noteBWV 1003Key of A minor

Gerald Larner wrote 3 versions of differing length — choose one below.

Versions
~400 words · violin so No.2 A mi · 433 words

Grave

Fuga

Andante

Allegro

One of the more fascinating questions associated with the three Sonatas and three Partitas for solo violin that Bach finalised in fair copy in Cöthen in 1720 is what instrumentalist, if any, they were intended for. Theories vary between, at one extreme, the idea that he wrote them for himself to play and, at the other, the belief that they are speculative responses to a supreme technical challenge. Bearing in mind the barely realistic twelve-minute Chaconne of the Partita in D minor, the latter notion has its attractions. It is clear, however, that the Cello Suites from the same period were written with practical considerations in mind, as the scordatura tuning in one case and the scoring for a five-stringed instrument in another surely confirm. There are no such requirements in the Violin Sonatas and Partitas but the dynamic markings intended to create echo effects - few though they are - surely confirm that the sonatas and partitas were meant to be heard and not just seen.

Even so, it is interesting that, as one of his students recalled, Bach frequently played the unaccompanied string works on the clavichord. Indeed, there is a keyboard arrangement, the Sonata in D minor BWV 964, of today’s Violin Sonata in A minor. The binary structure of the opening Grave is actually more effective in the keyboard version because the all-important bass line - which in the original is formed only with difficulty by the bottom notes of double-stopped or spread chords and which is less coherent to the ear than the melodic proliferation above it - is so much more clearly defined.

The fact that Bach found so little to add to the Fuga in the keyboard arrangement, apart from making explicit what is necessarily implicit in the violin version, indicates what a brilliant achievement it is. While it is not as long as the Fuga of the Sonata No.3 in C major, its nine-note theme is scarcely under-developed either in its original shape or in the inversion introduced after the second non-fugal episode.

Only a little decorative embellishment is added to the Andante, which needs nothing to enhance the tension sustained between its freely expressive melodic line and the rigorous rhythmic consistency of its ostinato accompaniment. Derived as it is from the Italian concerto tradition, the virtuoso figuration of the Allegro last movement (beginning with a rare example of echo cololuring) is far more effective in the violin version than in the unambitious keyboard arrangement.

From Gerald Larner’s files: “Sonata/violin so No.2 A mi/w416”