Composers › Ludwig van Beethoven › Programme note
Violin Sonata in F major Op.24 (“Spring”)
Gerald Larner wrote 5 versions of differing length — choose one below.
Movements
Allegro
Adagio molto espressivo
Scherzo: allegro molto
Rondo: allegro ma non troppo
The “Spring” Sonata – the second of the two violin sonatas Beethoven wrote between 1800 and 1801 for Count Moritz von Fries – is so beautifully written that it anticipates the last and most sublime of his violin sonatas, in G major Op.96, which is the supreme example of integrated scoring for violin and piano.
The first theme of the Sonata in F major is introduced not by the piano but by the violin, the instrument for which it was conceived, obviously: when it repeats the melody the piano prefers decorative run to the violin’s wide leaps. The second subject is a combined inspiration, its components readily transferable between the two instruments, neither of which would make much sense without the other. There are also colour effects which depend on blends of piano and violin sound, like the bare octaves at the momentarily quiet beginning of the development section or the legato semiquaver shared by piano and violin four octaves apart at the end of that section.
Instead of combining slow movement and scherzo as in the companion Fries Sonata in A minor Op.23, Beethoven offers – for the first time in these works – a fully characteristic, if brief, example of each. The Adagio, which loses all but a fragment of its main theme half-way through and does not reclaim it, seems incomplete as it dies out after the mysterious tremolos uttered by violin and piano together. So the onset of the brightly witty Scherzo is all the more effective. When the unpredictable rhythms of the outer sections cause an apparent disagreement in ensemble it is a joke in essentially duo terms.
Integration is complete in the last movement, a delightful sonata rondo with a flowing theme suited equally well to violin and piano. Like all the material in this movement, it is easily interchangeable between the two. The piano’s recapture of the main theme in the right key after the second episode inspires the violin to its first use of pizzicato chords in Beethoven’s violin sonatas. And the way the piano and violin encourage each other in inventing rhythmic variants on the main theme, just before the coda, is what chamber music is all about.
From Gerald Larner’s files: “Op.24/w364”
Movements
Allegro
Adagio molto espressivo
Scherzo: allegro molto
Rondo: allegro ma non troppo
Beethoven wrote his first three violin sonatas Op.12 between 1797 and 1798 but it was only in his next two Op.23 and Op.24 - both dedicated to Count Moritz von Fries and published as a pair in 1801 - that he caught up with Mozart in the art of integrating violin and piano. In Op.23 there is a distinct progress towards the liberation of the violin and its promotion to the heroic status it enjoys in the “Kreutzer” Sonata written a couple of years later. The “Spring” Sonata has a very different personality from that of its immediate predecessor in that it anticipates not so much the “Kreutzer” as the serene last Violin Sonata Op.96, which is the perfect example of integrated scoring for the two instruments.
The first theme of Op.24 is introduced not by the piano but by the violin, the instrument for which it was conceived, obviously: when it repeats the melody the piano prefers decorative run to the violin’s wide leaps. The second subject is a combined inspiration, its components readily transferable between the two instruments, neither of which would make much sense without the other. There are also colour effects which depend on blends of piano and violin sound, like the bare octaves at the momentarily quiet beginning of the development section or the legato semiquaver shared by piano and violin four octaves apart at the end of that section. Both of these colour ideas are echoed in the coda.
Instead of combining slow movement and scherzo as in Op.23, Beethoven offers - for the first time in a violin sonata - a fully characteristic, if brief, example of each. The Adagio, which loses all but a fragment of its main theme half-way through and does not reclaim it, sounds incomplete as it dies out after the mysterious tremolos uttered by violin and piano together. So the onset of the brightly witty Scherzo is all the more effective. When the unpredictable rhythms of the outer sections seem to cause a little disagreement in ensemble it is a joke in essentially duo terms.
Integration is complete in the last movement, a delightful sonata rondo with a flowing theme suited equally well to violin and piano. Like all the material in this movement, it is easily interchangeable between the two. The piano’s recapture of the main theme in the right key after the second episode inspires the violin to its first use of pizzicato chords in Beethoven’s violin sonatas. And the way the piano and violin encourage each other in inventing rhythmic variants on the main theme, just before the coda, is what chamber music is all about.
From Gerald Larner’s files: “Op.24/w436”
Movements
Allegro
Adagio molto espressivo
Scherzo: allegro molto
Rondo: allegro ma non troppo
The two violin sonatas Beethoven wrote in 1800 or 1801 for Count Moritz von Fries – Viennese banker and an influential supporter of the composer – are prophetic of two of the greatest works of their kind. In Op.23 in A minor there is a distinct progress towards the liberation of the violin and its promotion to the heroic status it enjoys in the “Kreutzer” Sonata written a couple of years later. The “Spring” Sonata Op.24 has a very different personality from that of its companion in that it anticipates the serene last Violin Sonata Op.96, which is the perfect example of integrated scoring for the two instruments.
The first theme of the Sonata in F major is introduced not by the piano but by the violin, the instrument for which it was conceived, obviously: when it repeats the melody the piano prefers decorative run to the violin’s wide leaps. The second subject is a combined inspiration, its components readily transferable between the two instruments, neither of which would make much sense without the other. There are also colour effects which depend on blends of piano and violin sound, like the bare octaves at the momentarily quiet beginning of the development section or the legato semiquaver shared by piano and violin four octaves apart at the end of that section. Both of these colour ideas are echoed in the coda.
Instead of combining slow movement and scherzo as in Op.23, Beethoven offers – for the first time in a violin sonata – a fully characteristic, if brief, example of each. The Adagio, which loses all but a fragment of its main theme half-way through and does not reclaim it, seems incomplete as it dies out after the mysterious tremolos uttered by violin and piano together. So the onset of the brightly witty Scherzo is all the more effective. When the unpredictable rhythms of the outer sections cause an apparent disagreement in ensemble between violin and piano it is a joke in essentially duo terms.
Integration is complete in the last movement, a delightful sonata rondo with a flowing theme suited equally well to violin and piano. Like all the material in this movement, it is easily interchangeable between the two. The piano’s recapture of the main theme in the right key after the second episode inspires the violin to its first use of pizzicato chords in Beethoven’s violin sonatas. And the way the piano and violin encourage each other in inventing rhythmic variants on the main theme, just before the coda, is what chamber music is all about.
From Gerald Larner’s files: “Op 24/w429.rtf”
Movements
Allegro
Adagio molto espressivo
Scherzo: allegro molto
Rondo: allegro ma non troppo
The two violin sonatas Beethoven wrote in 1800 or 1801 for Count Moritz von Fries – Viennese banker and an influential supporter of the composer – are prophetic of two of the greatest works of their kind. In Op.23 in A minor there is a distinct progress towards the liberation of the violin and its promotion to the heroic status it enjoys in the “Kreutzer” Sonata written a couple of years later. The “Spring” Sonata Op.24 has a very different personality from that of its companion in that it anticipates not only the serenity of the last Violin Sonata Op.96 but also its perfectly integrated scoring for the two instruments.
The Sonata in F major must owe its “Spring” nickname at least in part to the verdant freshness of the opening theme of the first movement. An essentially violin inspiration, it changes shape, acquiring elaborately decorative keyboard runs, when it is taken up by the piano. The second subject is a joint inspiration, its components readily transferable between the two instruments, neither of which would make much sense without the other. There are also colour effects which depend on blends of piano and violin sound, like the bare octaves at the momentarily quiet beginning of the development section or the legato semiquaver shared by piano and violin four octaves apart at the end of that section. Both of these colour ideas are echoed in the coda.
Instead of combining slow movement and scherzo as in Op.23, Beethoven offers – for the first time in a violin sonata – a fully characteristic, if brief, example of each. The Adagio, which loses all but a fragment of its main theme half-way through and does not reclaim it, seems incomplete as it dies out after the mysterious tremolos uttered by violin and piano together. So the onset of the brightly witty Scherzo is all the more effective. When the unpredictable rhythms of the outer sections cause an apparent disagreement in ensemble between violin and piano it is a joke in essentially duo terms.
Integration is complete in the last movement, a delightful sonata rondo with a flowing theme suited equally well to violin and piano. Like all the material in this movement, it is easily interchangeable between the two. The piano’s recapture of the main theme in the tonic key after the second episode is greeted by the first use of pizzicato chords in Beethoven’s violin sonatas. And the way the piano and violin encourage each other in inventing rhythmic variants on that theme, just before the coda, is what chamber music is all about.
From Gerald Larner’s files: “Op.24/w/rncm/n*.rtf”
Movements
Allegro
Adagio molto espressivo
Scherzo: allegro molto
Rondo: allegro ma non troppo
As the composer of seven concertos – most of them written for himself as soloist – Beethoven was clearly not averse to virtuoso music. He was quite happy to include it in a chamber context too, as he did when he wrote a Violin Sonata in A major, later to be known as the “Kreutzer,” in a “decidedly concertante manner, as though a concerto.” Of the two violin sonatas written immediately before the “Kreutzer,” both of them dedicated to Count Moritz von Fries and published as a pair in 1801, the one in A minor Op.23 represents an earlier stage in the promotion of the violin to heroic status. The other, the present Sonata in F major Op.24, leads in a different direction. Having far more to do with melody than with bravura, it anticipates the sublime last Violin Sonata in G major Op.96, which is the perfect example of integrated scoring for violin and piano.
The first theme of the “Spring” Sonata – so called because of its verdant freshness – is introduced not by the piano but by the violin, the instrument for which it was conceived, obviously: when it repeats the melody the piano prefers decorative runs to the violin’s wide leaps. The second subject is a combined inspiration, its components readily transferable between the two instruments, neither of which would make much sense without the other. There are also colour effects which depend on blends of piano and violin sound, like the bare octaves at the momentarily quiet beginning of the development section or the legato semiquavers shared by piano and violin four octaves apart at the end of that section. Both of these colour ideas are echoed in the coda.
Instead of combining slow movement and scherzo as in Op.23, Beethoven offers – for the first time in a violin sonata – a fully characteristic, if brief, example of each. The Adagio, which loses all but a fragment of its main theme half-way through and does not reclaim it, seems incomplete as it dies out after the mysterious tremolos uttered by violin and piano together. So the onset of the brightly witty Scherzo is all the more effective. When the unpredictable rhythms of the outer sections seem to cause a little disagreement in ensemble it is a joke in essentially duo terms.
Integration is complete in the last movement, a delightful sonata rondo with a flowing theme suited equally well to violin and piano. Like all the material in this movement, it is easily interchangeable between the two. The piano’s recapture of the main theme in the right key after the second episode inspires the violin to its first use of pizzicato chords in Beethoven’s violin sonatas. And the way the piano and violin encourage each other in inventing rhythmic variants on the main theme, just before the coda, is what chamber music is all about.
From Gerald Larner’s files: “Op.24/w480.rtf”